logo-2 Language Industries Back

Agri & Fresh

Chemicals

Food

Manufacturing

Pharma & Life Sciences

Projects & Services

Public Services

Wholesale & Distribution

Solutions Back ERP

ERP: Where to start?

Finance & Operations

Business Central

CRM

Field Sales CRM

HRM

Power Platform

Industry & Additional Solutions

Customer Stories Insights Back

Ebooks

Events

Blog

Webinars

News

About us Back

Who we are

What we believe

Partnerships

Join us

Back
Select language

Corporate (English)

Austria (German)

Belgium (Dutch)

Denmark (English)

Germany (German)

Italy (Italian)

Sweden (English)

The Netherlands (Dutch)

Contact
logo-2 Corporate (English) Austria (German) Belgium (Dutch) Denmark (English) Germany (German) Italy (Italian) Sweden (English) The Netherlands (Dutch) Contact
Home Blog Blog Debunking 6 Dynamics 365 ERP Myths
Business Central
Finance & Operations
2 minutes reading

Debunking 6 Dynamics 365 ERP Myths

Thomas Van Dorpe

Thomas Van Dorpe

December 02, 2024

In our earlier blog, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations vs. Business Central, we discussed the similarities and differences between these two platforms. In this blog, we delve deeper into both systems by addressing some statements that we often hear. What are the myths, and what are the facts?

Myth or Fact #1: Only F&O can be used for international organizations

Let’s start with Finance & Operations. This system allows you to choose from a list of entities, work with a Shared Service Center, and benefit from comprehensive overarching analytics. Business Central, on the other hand, offers a different look and feel and operates using separate production environments and localizations per country.

A Shared Service Center is not available in Business Central; you always work per organization or database. In Finance & Operations, all localizations are included in one license, whereas Business Central requires an additional license per production environment for each localization or country.

Myth or Fact #2: Business Central cannot meet our intercompany needs

Intercompany functionality can be examined from three perspectives: financial, resource sharing, and supply chain.

  • Financial: Both systems offer similar capabilities, such as sharing master data to enable seamless intercompany processes.
  • Resource sharing: This is not available by default in Business Central. However, Cegeka provides a vertical solution that enables resource sharing across projects. In Finance & Operations, resource sharing is standard, allowing employees and resources to be easily defined and distributed across countries and entities.
  • Connected supply chain: In this case, there is a clear distinction. Business Central has limited functionality due to its technical setup with multiple production databases. Finance & Operations includes a connected supply chain as part of its core solution, offering extensive features for planning, logistics, and more.

Both systems can meet intercompany needs, but for a connected international supply chain, Finance & Operations is the better choice.

Myth or Fact #3: Only F&O can meet our industry-specific needs

Both Business Central and Finance & Operations (F&O) provide robust features tailored to a wide variety of industries. While F&O offers extensive out-of-the-box functionality, Business Central complements this with a versatile horizontal layer and highly customizable applications. Additionally, for both platforms, extra functionalities for specific industries are available through apps.

Myth or Fact #4: Microsoft integrates new technology only into F&O

AI, Copilot, and other new technologies are equally integrated into both solutions. However, specific roadmap functionalities are partially determined by customers and partners, which may lead to differences between Business Central and Finance & Operations.

Myth or Fact #5: Non-functional factors are less important

When selecting an ERP system, functional aspects are often the main focus. While crucial, non-functional factors also play a significant role. These include timing, budget, change management, the availability of key users, and the organization’s growth strategy.

Myth or Fact #6: A technical upgrade is always the best choice

When organizations consider adopting a new solution, their first instinct is often to upgrade to the cloud version of their existing system.  However, as businesses evolve due to growth and changing needs, it’s essential to evaluate whether this remains the best choice for your organization.

Want to know which Microsoft ERP system fits your organization best? Our ERP simulator can help you find the perfect match. Or, feel free to contact us directly for more information.

Pop up  ERP pagina BE (2)

Thomas Van Dorpe

Thomas Van Dorpe

More of Thomas Van Dorpe articles